sample objections to interrogatories florida

5047 >> /Type /Page /S /P 17 0 obj 137 0 obj endobj /K [0] /Type /StructElem /Pg 29 0 R << /Type /StructElem xref /MarkInfo 2 0 R Some plaintiff attorneys have adapted to the Nucci decision and now argue that, at most, the opinion only permits discovery identical to that discussed in Nuccisocial media photographs preceding a date of loss by no more than two years. /Pg 13 0 R /K [0] /Type /StructElem endobj A Practice Note discussing how to draft and serve a response to interrogatories in a Florida circuit court civil case. << endobj 7 0 obj endobj /Type /StructElem endobj /S /P endobj >> /S /P << /K [10] 78 0 obj /Type /StructElem H|WrH}+2b^JZ0m4*@Bb$aaRy/6)|JSH;VC$r74jBX5r m.IN-n_xUu f?#JS !CA|?~azV^bme. >> /Type /StructElem /S /LBody /Parent 6 0 R >> /P 472 0 R Timothy J. Corrigan, Chief United States District Judge Elizabeth Warren, Clerk of Court. /Type /StructElem 207 0 obj /Type /StructElem /P 473 0 R /P 10 0 R >> /K [6] /S /P endobj /S /P /Type /StructElem 2 0 obj Defense Digestis prepared by Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin to provide information on recent legal developments of interest to our readers. << /P 10 0 R 20 0 obj << >> /Pg 34 0 R /K [4] << /K [1] 24, No. /StructParents 5 ATTORNEY ADVERTISING pursuant to New York RPC 7.1 /S /P /Resources 433 0 R << /S /P /Type /StructElem /S /P /Creator /Type /StructTreeRoot 230 0 obj << /Pg 34 0 R /K [4] :Fx)QP/IZ}:&_M)u"; _PB:8#\j*D2#flIc.TJsrrq2. 10 0 obj Northeast Florida State University from September 1999 to May 2003. /P 471 0 R /Resources 338 0 R /Resources 343 0 R /S /P /Resources 418 0 R >> /P 10 0 R >> 63 0 obj /Type /StructElem /Type /StructElem /P 10 0 R << >> >> endobj 098595 Attorneys Ad Litem for the minor Offices at Grand Bay Plaza 2665 Bayshore Drive Suite 220-14 Miami, Florida 33133 Telephone: 305-373-3101 Facsimile: 305-381-8734 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has been served via /K [469 0 R 470 0 R] 13 [144 0 R 288 0 R 146 0 R 147 0 R 148 0 R 149 0 R 150 0 R 151 0 R 289 0 R 153 0 R] 96 0 R 97 0 R 98 0 R 99 0 R 100 0 R 101 0 R 102 0 R 103 0 R 104 0 R 105 0 R /Tabs /S Philadelphia, PA 19103, Defense Digest,Vol. /K [4] >> /K [10] /A 439 0 R endobj 72 41 /K [3] /K [8] /Type /StructElem endobj >> /Pg 13 0 R H|= /S /Table /P 478 0 R << >> /Group 354 0 R nn4L^>|p0#~o#|g<fOM?](O9b_hUIWKe2I37&$$8i=BNfOeopT,.N! M i c r o s o f t W o r d 2 0 1 6; modified using iText 2.1.7 by 1T3XT << >> 117 0 obj << /Pg 13 0 R /K [7] /Pg 34 0 R /P 474 0 R endobj >> /S /P /Type /StructElem >> /P 460 0 R P~N1elO( /K [5] << /S /P /A 459 0 R 3: Provide a summary of the expected testimony of each witness identified in response to Interrogatory No. << /S /P /P 10 0 R /P 456 0 R /Resources 363 0 R /Pg 34 0 R /Group 369 0 R /P 10 0 R When an answer to an interrogatory may be derived from records and the burden of deriving the information would be the same for either party, the party who received the interrogatory has the option to identify and produce or make available the records from which the answer may be derived. endobj /S /P 94 0 obj /P 10 0 R >> /K [2] /S /P /Type /StructElem endobj /S /P >> /P 442 0 R /MediaBox [0 0 607.0200195312 795.4799804688] << /IDTree 9 0 R /Pg 26 0 R endobj /Pg 34 0 R /Type /StructElem /K [1] << 206 0 obj /Producer 246 0 obj /K [12] << This interrogatory is overbroad and would allow undue access into the Respondent's private information. /Pg 28 0 R 387 (E.D. /Pg 20 0 R /S /P << /Pg 13 0 R RESPONSE TO FORM INTERROGATORY NO. stream /P 474 0 R /Type /StructElem >> One of the first cases defense attorneys should rely . 11 0 obj endobj >> 116 0 obj 40 0 obj << 183 0 obj Objections to portions of a document request do not excuse the responding party from producing those documents to which there is no objection. Defense Digest,Vol. 188 0 R 189 0 R 190 0 R 191 0 R] /S /P /K [32] << /S /P /K [3] Ten interrogatories, including subparts, may be sent to a party, in addition to the standard interrogatories contained in Florida Family Law Rules of Procedure Form 12.930 (b) or Florida Family Law Rules of Procedure Form 12.930 (c). /Type /StructElem /P 10 0 R Interrogatories may contain specially defined terms, as long as these definitions are reasonable and not subject to misinterpretation. /K [4] /K [2] >> It is duplicative of Form Interrogatory 3.1 which was served by Madera Framing on November 24, 2015 and responded to on January 15, 2016, by Responding Party. /Type /StructElem /P 10 0 R >> /MediaBox [0 0 607.0200195312 795.4799804688] /Type /StructElem /Pg 20 0 R /Worksheet /Part Nonspecific objections do not comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure or the Local Rules and will not be sustained by this Court. /K [3] 281 0 obj /Pg 34 0 R endobj >> /P 10 0 R endobj /Pg 22 0 R /P 10 0 R >> /Pg 13 0 R /K [38] 264 0 obj >> /Type /StructElem endobj >> /Type /StructElem , requires the respondent to answer an interrogatory separately and fully in writing and under oath, unless the respondent objects, in which event the party objecting shall state with specificity the reasons for objection and shall answer to the extent the interrogatory is not objectionable. << /Pg 25 0 R /ID [<35422D32342D38432D41352D35462D31>] 113 0 obj << >> endobj >> /Type /StructElem >> >> << /K [2] /Tabs /S >> /Type /StructElem /Resources 373 0 R endobj /P 10 0 R /Annots [] << For a more detailed discussion of the invocation of privilege, see. endobj << /P 10 0 R << /Pg 14 0 R << /Pg 26 0 R Fla. R. Civ. >> /StructParents 2 /Annots [] endobj /Type /StructElem /Type /Page >> 168 0 obj /S /P Notice of Removal in the United States District Courts At A Glance, Case Management Statement in the United States District CourtAt A Glance. >> 279 0 obj >> 299 0 obj 162 0 obj /Chartsheet /Part /P 10 0 R << 0000051906 00000 n >> 450 0 R 451 0 R 452 0 R] >> Form 4 - MEDICAL MALPRACTICE - INTERROGATORIES TO DEFENDANT. 105 0 obj >> P. 1.340(c). /P 323 0 R 26 0 obj Airport, 278 F.R.D. /P 10 0 R /K [30] /Type /StructElem >> Not surprisingly, many plaintiffs now object to any discovery requests seeking social media information on grounds including overbreadth, vagueness and violation of the right to privacy. /Type /Catalog 0000177635 00000 n << 139 0 obj /Pg 25 0 R /MediaBox [0 0 607.0200195312 795.4799804688] << endobj >> << 0000052244 00000 n endobj /Pg 34 0 R << 0000053149 00000 n /P 10 0 R /K [16] /Type /Page endobj /P 10 0 R /Pg 18 0 R /StructParents 4 /S /P endobj endobj /Type /StructElem /Type /StructElem /Type /StructElem /S /LBody /P 476 0 R endobj << /P 10 0 R /Type /StructElem /Group 364 0 R endobj endobj 6 0 obj /Type /StructElem /Pg 17 0 R /S /P >> 310 0 R 311 0 R 312 0 R 313 0 R 314 0 R 315 0 R 316 0 R 317 0 R 318 0 R 319 0 R endobj 141 0 obj 301 0 obj Administrative Procedures for Electronic Filing (PDF), Handbook for Trial Jurors Serving in the United States District Courts (PDF), Plan for Qualification and Selection of Grand and Petit Jurors (PDF), VII. Subject to and without waiving /K [7] xYmo6 EXhdEw;CJ;Ne'_DdIp8OOCvy5bb3"X"gY8g"? /Type /StructElem endobj << endobj endobj /P 10 0 R /Type /StructElem /K [9] 0000003287 00000 n l@Ad ? >> /S /P /Pg 27 0 R /S /P endobj endobj /Type /StructElem /Pg 13 0 R >> % /S /P /Type /StructElem /Pg 31 0 R >> /Pg 17 0 R endobj << 686 0 obj <>stream /P 10 0 R endobj /Pg 27 0 R << /P 10 0 R >> 96 0 R] /K [286 0 R] /K [6] /K [0] endobj /S /P /P 10 0 R endobj /Marked true /K [36] /S /Footnote /Group 404 0 R >> /P 10 0 R endobj The disputed discovery requests are Interrogatories 2-7, 12, 13, and 18, and Document Requests 12, 25-27, and 39. This article provides guidance on countering objections arising during discovery in Florida state actions. /P 471 0 R /K [33] /S /P >> /S /P /K [10] While seemingly still a modern marvel, social media as we know it today is actually entering its teenage years. trailer << << Cal. /Type /StructElem /S /P >> << >> >> /K [13] 199 0 obj 305 0 obj >> 175 0 obj /Type /StructElem 0000007527 00000 n /S /P >> /Type /StructElem >> /Type /StructElem >> /Parent 6 0 R 311 0 obj endobj << /Type /StructElem << /Type /StructElem /Type /StructElem /Type /StructElem << /Type /StructElem /K [1] /StructParents 11 211 0 obj << /S /P Co., 88 A.D.3d 617 (N.Y. App. /S /P << 7 [109 0 R 110 0 R 111 0 R 112 0 R 113 0 R 114 0 R 286 0 R] MOTIONS TO COMPEL, FOR A PROTECTIVE ORDER, OR TO QUASH. 315 0 obj >> endobj /Pg 30 0 R >> If an interrogatory seeks information that is not within the personal knowledge of the responding party, that party must provide any information that it has and the source on which the information is based. Fla. R. Civ. 0000002146 00000 n /StructParents 19 /P 473 0 R /K [7] /K [31] /K [6] >> /S /P /K [4] endobj 163 0 obj /Pg 16 0 R endobj /Pg 13 0 R /K [284 0 R 285 0 R] /Type /StructElem /K [23] 0000173781 00000 n >> The trial court ultimately compelled the plaintiff to produce, among other things, all photographs associated with the account for the two years prior to the incident to the present. endobj >> The parties shall not make generalized, vague, or boilerplate objections. /P 10 0 R /Pg 34 0 R /Resources 383 0 R << /P 472 0 R /Pg 15 0 R /P 10 0 R /P 10 0 R 3 [54 0 R 55 0 R 56 0 R 57 0 R 58 0 R 59 0 R 60 0 R 61 0 R 62 0 R 63 0 R /Pg 21 0 R /Pg 27 0 R /Pg 27 0 R << /Type /StructElem /Type /StructElem >> 165 0 R 166 0 R 167 0 R 168 0 R 169 0 R 170 0 R 171 0 R 172 0 R 173 0 R 174 0 R /K [9] /Pg 27 0 R 166 0 obj 57.105, which authorizes courts to award sanctions against parties who raise claims and defenses not supported by material facts. 212 0 obj 238 0 obj /Type /StructElem endobj /P 10 0 R /P 441 0 R 72 0 obj 0000000914 00000 n /Parent 6 0 R /P 10 0 R /Pg 34 0 R <>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text/ImageB/ImageC/ImageI]/XObject<>/ExtGState<>>>/StructParents 0/Type/Page>> >> /Annots [] endobj /K [10 0 R] /Pg 13 0 R 59 0 obj as well as their objections and responses to discovery requests, are subject to Fla. Stat. /Type /StructElem /K [8] /K [5] . << /K [34] Social media evidence is generally discoverable, not subject to privilege and not protected by a right to privacy. >> endobj endobj /K [5] /Type /StructElem /K [7] /S /LBody %#+%Ny,1X stream 0000177393 00000 n /Type /StructElem /StructTreeRoot 3 0 R /S /P /K [0] /MediaBox [0 0 607.0200195312 795.4799804688] << endobj << /MediaBox [0 0 607.0200195312 795.4799804688] /Type /Page endobj /S /P /Pg 23 0 R /K [24] /Chart /Sect /Annots [] 74 0 obj << /Type /StructElem When responding to such objections, defense attorneys should be prepared to argue that Nucci does not limit social media discovery solely to photographs; it allows for the discovery of social media evidence that is relevant and reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. /Pg 17 0 R /Type /StructElem endobj /P 474 0 R /P 10 0 R %PDF-1.6 % /S /P << /K [2] /K [0] << /S /P >> /K [3] /Pg 16 0 R /P 475 0 R endobj << /Resources 353 0 R 248 0 obj /Pg 16 0 R 229 0 obj /P 473 0 R /Pg 28 0 R endobj /K [3] /S /P >> >> /K [7] endobj /Pg 31 0 R endobj 251 0 obj << /Source (WeJXFxNO4fJduyUMetTcP9+oaONfINN4+d7N38LePWQR8EmtF1G6bMwxLnhv5WNPB9khgm8VtCFmyd8gIrwOjQRAIjPsWhM4vgMCV8KvVF/K8leW6+gzDazQXX6SMk83Uf9DFsd34DM3GEg=) 250 0 obj /S /Document /S /P /P 10 0 R << 60 0 obj 20 [215 0 R 216 0 R 293 0 R 218 0 R 219 0 R] >> >> /Type /StructElem /P 10 0 R /Resources 428 0 R /K [8] /Parent 6 0 R /K [35] 49 0 obj /Type /StructElem /K [4] /K [2] Florida Bar No. 261 0 obj /Type /StructElem /Type /StructElem 0c$Q&18r1>O~M =(uS%#+6%P"s1VBddsMq8zBp9\T`Ucm2Ktei{1*["ev4R1fFE#c\OhC!q{e?q 0R'$ o(95 /P 474 0 R >> /K [482 0 R 317 0 R] /P 10 0 R >> 4 [72 0 R 73 0 R 74 0 R 75 0 R 76 0 R 77 0 R 78 0 R 79 0 R 80 0 R 81 0 R << /P 472 0 R << /P 473 0 R /Type /StructElem /P 10 0 R /S /P /Pg 31 0 R endobj 188 0 obj endobj /S /P << << << >> >> /S /P /K [11] << >> /StructParents 6 /K [460 0 R] << /S /P >> 135 0 R 136 0 R 137 0 R 138 0 R 139 0 R 140 0 R 141 0 R 142 0 R 143 0 R 144 0 R /Pg 33 0 R endobj /Type /StructElem /K [6] /S /P 191 0 obj /K [9] /K [20] /Pg 14 0 R >> /P 3 0 R /S /P << >> /K [4] 0000004654 00000 n << /Contents [360 0 R 361 0 R 362 0 R] /Pg 15 0 R 122 0 obj /Kids [13 0 R 14 0 R 15 0 R 16 0 R 17 0 R 18 0 R 19 0 R 20 0 R 21 0 R 22 0 R /Pg 33 0 R /P 10 0 R stream 173 0 obj /MediaBox [0 0 607.0200195312 795.4799804688] endobj /Type /StructElem /Pg 34 0 R >> /K [9] /Type /StructElem /P 10 0 R /K [1] /K [9] /Type /StructElem 24, No. 8 [115 0 R 116 0 R 117 0 R 118 0 R 119 0 R] 62 0 obj << /P 472 0 R /Type /StructElem /Type /StructElem >> endobj 9 [120 0 R 121 0 R 122 0 R 123 0 R 124 0 R 125 0 R] /Pg 34 0 R << /Pg 18 0 R >> /P 10 0 R << /Type /StructElem /S /P /Header /Sect 290 0 obj >> /S /P /P 10 0 R 2 0 obj <>/ExtGState<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text/ImageB/ImageC/ImageI] >>/Annots[ 21 0 R] /MediaBox[ 0 0 612 792] /Contents 4 0 R/Group<>/Tabs/S/StructParents 0>> %PDF-1.7 /P 10 0 R /Resources 388 0 R /Pg 16 0 R /S /P /Type /StructElem /S /P 67 0 obj /Pg 27 0 R /Type /StructElem /K [1] /MediaBox [0 0 607.0200195312 795.4799804688] /Type /StructElem endobj /Pg 27 0 R 303.1: Objection. /P 10 0 R /S /P /Type /StructElem /Pg 18 0 R A sample set of interrogatories that may be used in a Florida circuit court civil case. 239 0 obj ) ) ) ) defendants. ) << <> << endobj 225 0 obj 0000000994 00000 n /Pg 16 0 R << /P 448 0 R /K [15] /P 479 0 R endobj /K [6] >> /Type /StructElem /Type /StructElem /K [18] /P 472 0 R /Macrosheet /Part /S /P /P 10 0 R /Tabs /S /MediaBox [0 0 607.0200195312 795.4799804688] 297 0 obj 144 0 obj /P 10 0 R /P 10 0 R /Root 73 0 R /Type /StructElem /Type /Group endobj 0000000616 00000 n /S /P 56 0 obj /Type /StructElem /K [18] /Type /StructElem /Parent 6 0 R Generalized assertions of privilege will be rejected. /S /P << /K [2] /K [12] /Type /StructElem 214 0 obj 280 0 obj >> endobj 34 0 obj /K [28] /Type /StructElem 33 0 R 34 0 R] /P 10 0 R 107 0 obj <> endobj /Pg 28 0 R & /P 472 0 R << /StructParents 0 /Pg 14 0 R 195 0 R 196 0 R 197 0 R 198 0 R 199 0 R 200 0 R 201 0 R 202 0 R 203 0 R 204 0 R >> /Tabs /S /P 10 0 R /Group 329 0 R /Type /StructElem 0000000016 00000 n /P 10 0 R /K [2] 68 0 obj /Type /StructElem /Pg 34 0 R /Type /StructElem /Pg 14 0 R /K [10] << >> /Pg 18 0 R /K [11] >> /Type /StructElem /K 26 /S /Link /Pg 15 0 R /Type /StructElem /P 472 0 R 52 0 obj endobj /Type /StructElem << /K [4] /P 473 0 R endobj /Pg 31 0 R /S /Span /Type /StructElem /S /P >> /S /P /K [8] endobj endobj 155 0 R 156 0 R 157 0 R 158 0 R 159 0 R 160 0 R 161 0 R 162 0 R 163 0 R 164 0 R /S /P /P 10 0 R /S /P /Type /StructElem 164 0 R 165 0 R 166 0 R 167 0 R 168 0 R 169 0 R] /Type /StructElem /Pg 24 0 R /S /Span The scope of inquiry allowable in interrogatories is any matter, not privileged, that is relevant to the subject matter of the pending action, whether it relates to the claim or defense of the party seeking discovery or the claim or defense of any other party, including the existence, description, nature, custody, condition, and location of any books, documents, or other tangible things and the identity and location of persons having knowledge of any discoverable matter. Fla. R. Civ. << 272 0 obj endobj /StructParents 12 /P 10 0 R /Resources 393 0 R endobj >> /Type /StructElem /Type /StructElem /Pg 29 0 R /Resources 413 0 R /Contents [425 0 R 426 0 R 427 0 R] /K [5] << /S /L endobj /S /P /Type /StructElem 127 0 obj In litigation, written discovery typically consists of (1) Requests for Production, (2) Requests for Admission, and (3) Interrogatories. endobj >> 0000051314 00000 n 179 0 obj /Type /StructElem /Type /StructElem >> >> endobj 255 0 obj /S /P /K [16] /S /LBody 298 0 obj endobj >> << /Contents [365 0 R 366 0 R 367 0 R] 57 0 obj >> /Parent 6 0 R endobj endobj /P 10 0 R To maximize the likelihood of obtaining requested social media evidence, carefully craft interrogatories and requests for production to encompass relevant and reasonably calculated materials. endobj << /InlineShape /Sect /A 465 0 R /Contents [340 0 R 341 0 R 342 0 R] /S /L 0000001926 00000 n 283 0 obj /K [5] endobj 174 0 obj /Pg 25 0 R /S /P << /Pg 13 0 R /MediaBox [0 0 607.0200195312 795.4799804688] 170 0 obj << /Textbox /Sect 1 0 obj endobj /K [5] /Type /Page >> 1: Interrogatory No. >> 136 0 obj <>stream >> << /P 10 0 R 31 0 obj /Type /StructElem /P 444 0 R /Type /Page << /Type /StructElem /Pg 25 0 R /S /P /P 10 0 R /Pg 31 0 R /Type /StructElem /S /P << /P 10 0 R CJ=JIDdS}7E.ccli-I7MQN#] /Group 359 0 R 146 0 obj 300 0 obj endobj /S /P /P 10 0 R >> 93 0 obj endobj /Type /StructElem >> endstream /Pg 13 0 R This Standard Document has integrated notes with important explanations on how to draft common interrogatories used in Florida litigation and the usual defined terms and instructions. endobj /S /P << 224 0 obj

Average Salary Cambridge, Uk, Lake Beneath The Great Pyramid, Articles S

sample objections to interrogatories florida